In this month's Washington Monthly seven fairly prominent conservatives, albeit ones who do not serve in office, explain why they would prefer a divided government come January. In Time for us to go these conservatives explain why a "time out" would be better for the long term goals of the conservative movement.
The Review
- All posts, comments and
statements made on IR are those of the authors only. Any disputes must be addressed to the writers, who are solely responsible for their posts, comments and statements. We reserve the right to deny or remove comments. Content may not be used without permission of the author.
Subscribe
Follow IR
« Churchgoers more likely to vote Republican | Main | Not voting? Fine. . . IR Voter motivator #1 »
Tuesday, September 12, 2006
Comments
Contact IR
Categories
- Abortion (712)
- ACORN/SEIU (101)
- Brinkman's Reviews (4)
- Campaign 2012 (846)
- Campaign 2014 (211)
- Campaign 2016 (254)
- Campaign 2018 (43)
- Campaign 2020 (95)
- Campaign 2022 (80)
- COVID-19 (117)
- Di Leo columns (253)
- Durbin (112)
- Economy (756)
- Education (435)
- Energy & Environment (276)
- Family & Marriage (455)
- For the Good of Illinois PAC (13)
- Foreign Policy (207)
- Free Markets (316)
- Government Reform (908)
- Health Care (612)
- Hesham Shehab Columns (1)
- HPV Vaccination (47)
- Illinois Hall of Fame (227)
- Illinois politics (78)
- Immigration (351)
- Interviews (45)
- IR 2014 Candidate Survey bios (10)
- IR Reviews (38)
- Jobs & Labor (267)
- Legal Issues & Courts (475)
- Masters of Manufacturing (31)
- Media (480)
- Religion (196)
- Second Amendment (213)
- Taxes (426)
- War on Terrorism (359)