Family Breakdown Costs Illinois Taxpayers Nearly $2 Billion Annually

by David E. Smith (Executive Director - Illinois Family Institute) 

First-Time Research Reveals Staggering Annual Taxpayer Costs for Divorce and Unwed Childbearing. Costs Taxpayers at Least $112 Billion a Year

In first-ever research, a new report quantifies a minimum $112 billion annual taxpayer cost from high rates of divorce and unmarried childbearing. It identifies national, state, and local costs which account for more than $1 trillion in the last decade. This landmark scholarly study, entitled "The Taxpayer Costs of Divorce and Unwed Childbearing: First-Ever Estimates for the Nation and All 50 States," was released on April 15th at the National Press Club by four renown policy and research groups -- Institute for American Values, Georgia Family Council, Institute for Marriage and Public Policy, and Families Northwest.

"This study documents for the first time, that divorce and unwed childbearing-besides being bad for children-are also costing taxpayers a ton of money," said David Blankenhorn, president of the Institute for American Values. "Even a small improvement in the health of marriage in America would result in enormous savings to taxpayers," he continued. "For example, a 1 percent reduction in rates of family fragmentation would save taxpayers $1.1 billion."

Statewide figures for all 50 states are included in this national report. There is a huge percentage of female-headed households living in poverty-61.5 percent of the 1.3 million total households in poverty in Illinois, for example. Research indicates as the cautious assumption that if those female-headed households were to become married, 60 percent of them would be lifted out of poverty. This means that total poverty in Illinois would be reduced by 36.9 percent. This could lead to an annual savings for Illinois of $1,949,000,000.

"These costs are due to increased taxpayer expenditures for anti-poverty, criminal justice and education programs, and through lower levels of taxes paid by individuals whose adult productivity has been negatively affected by increased childhood poverty caused by family fragmentation," said principal investigator Ben Scafidi, Ph.D., economics professor at Georgia College & State University.

"Prior research shows that marriage lifts single mothers out of poverty and therefore reduces the need for costly social benefits," said Scafidi. "This new report shows that public concern about the decline of marriage need not be based only on 'moral' concerns, but that reducing high taxpayer costs of family fragmentation is a legitimate concern of government, policymakers and legislators, as well as community reformers and faith communities."

"This report now provides the basis for a national consensus that strengthening marriage is a legitimate policy concern," said Blankenhorn. "The report's numbers represent an extremely cautious estimate, a lower-bound figure, and have been vetted by a group of distinguished scholars and economists who have attached their names as advisors to this report."

"These numbers represent real people and real suffering," said Randy Hicks, president of Georgia Family Council. "Both economic and human costs make family fragmentation a legitimate public concern. Historically, Americans have resisted the impulse to surrender to negative and hurtful trends. We fight problems like racism, poverty and domestic violence because we understand that the stakes are high. And while we'll never eliminate divorce and unwed childbearing entirely, we can certainly be doing more to help marriages and families succeed."

The Illinois Family Institute is committed to working for strong families and will be pushing legislative reform in Springfield so that marriage is upheld in Illinois law. The laws and culture of the Prairie State cannot afford to ignore the fact that marriage remains the single best way to keep children out of poverty. This study reveals the actual financial toll family fragmentation takes on Illinois taxpayers. Additionally, when researchers find a way to quantify the costs of earned income tax credits, adult education and training, transfer program subsidies and crime rates, the total cost of family fragmentation is likely to be even higher.

This report confirms what we've known for many years -- that our state benefits greatly from strong, stable marriages and that we're all paying a high price for broken families.

Comments

[Michael Burns]

Memo to Madigan, Fritchey, et al: Figure out way to protect trial lawyers, government bureaucrats, and feminists [first] who seek to profit from divorce.

We can't just go and protect marriage and leave these folks out in the cold(!)

; )

[Michael Burns]

David,

Thanks for posting this.

This is a really important study to be brought to light. The only issue that
I have (with Blankenhorn), from my last observation, is that he refuses to look at the issues and incentives that drive out-of-wedlock child births, father absence and divorce.

If I'm reading into this correctly... are they maintaining the same mantra from the
past--that the only way to protect traditional marriage is by banning Gay marriage(?)

Not that I'm switching over to the other team; I just think it's time that we
be honest about what's happening here, and not take something highly substantive and dilute it into something else that misses the point entirely.

The biggest threat to marriage are the incentives for divorce and out-of-wedlock child births. Period.

Best regards,

Michael Burns
President/Co-founder
Illinois Alliance for Parents and Children
Chicago, Illinois

www.illinoisparentsandchildren.org

[Robert Gartner]

David Blankenhorn has not done society a service without mentioning the 'bottom feeders', aka state attorney generals, which turn fathers into wage providers while it ignores any future relationship a child might have with its father. State Ag's get a monetary kickback from the FED for every father it turns into a wage slave and for every motehr it ignores as to her fitness to parent.

Taxpayers take note that your own government has done a great part to bring you into its commodification of children.

[Andrew Steiger]

Great a report that for the first time brings to light the problems of the secretive IV-D 'pograms'. The word pogram is not used lightly as the devastation to the quality , psyche and mental stability of American children is now about to hit us at the doorstep. Does anyone care, well as our taxpayer dollars furnish administrative and political costs before they ever reach one child, we should at some point be forced into reevaluating a system that has developed into welfare for a professional class that never existed before. Not even the modelled bolchevists surpassed the efficiency to which this system has so ensnared every American whether directly or indirectly. Inextricably linked to the privatation of the prison industry, welfare, family, data collection and jeuvenile tribunals, run by a fiscal network of the very same industries. The question I always asked and never recieved an answer for was 'when was a middle class child of divorce a case of welfare'(76%(e) of all divorces), and yet everyday the government officials make a point of claiming that each and everyone is, and that is for the claiming of tax dollars, better yet answer me this where does the claimed taxpayer dollars go. After all those children who really need help, never see a penny.